Why the study?
Does an automated algorithm accurately identify and quantify brown adipose tissue in human 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans compared to radiologist interpretation?
Does an automated algorithm accurately identify and quantify brown adipose tissue in human 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans compared to radiologist interpretation?
An automated algorithm demonstrated 85.7% agreement with radiologist interpretation for identifying brown adipose tissue on PET/CT scans, offering a potential tool for obesity research.
Supports automated BAT quantification on PET/CT in obesity research; leaves open prospective validation before wider adoption.
OBJECTIVE: To develop an algorithm to identify and quantify BAT from PET/CT scans without radiologist interpretation. DESIGN AND METHODS: Cases (n = 17) were randomly selected from PET/CT scans with documented "brown fat" by the reviewing radiologist. Controls (n = 18) had no documented "brown fat" and were matched with cases for age (49.7 [31.0-63.0] vs. 52.4 [24.0-70.0] yrs), outdoor temperature at scan date (51.8 [38.9-77.0] vs. 54.9 [35.2-74.6] °F), sex (F/M: 15/2 cases; 16/2 controls) and BMI (28.2 [20.0-45.7] vs. 26.8 [21.4-37.1] kg/m(2) ]). PET/CT scans and algorithm-generated images were read by the same radiologist blinded to scan identity. Regions examined included neck, mediastinum, supraclavicular fossae, axilla and paraspinal soft tissues. BAT was scored 0 for no BAT; 1 for faint uptake possibly compatible with BAT or unknown; and 2 for BAT positive. RESULTS: Agreement between the algorithm and PET/CT scan readings was 85.7% across all regions. The algorithm had a low false negative (1.6%) and higher false positive rate (12.7%). The false positive rate was greater in mediastinum, axilla and neck regions. CONCLUSION: The algorithm's low false negative rate combined with further refinement will yield a useful tool for efficient BAT identification in a rapidly growing field particularly as it applies to obesity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruth et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: