Key result
Combining remote ischaemic conditioning with either GIK or exenatide significantly reduced myocardial infarct size compared to single treatments (21.04% vs 36.64%; P=0.004) in pigs.
Why the study?
Does the combination of remote ischaemic conditioning with exenatide or GIK reduce infarct size more than single treatments in a pig model of ischemia-reperfusion?
Does the combination of remote ischaemic conditioning with exenatide or GIK reduce infarct size more than single treatments in a pig model of ischemia-reperfusion?
Absolute Event Rate: 21.04% vs 36.64%
p-value: p=0.004
Combination therapy with remote ischaemic conditioning and either GIK or exenatide has additive effects on reducing myocardial infarct size in a pig model of ischemia-reperfusion.
Additive effects in pigs should not yet change practice; leaves open translation to human cardioprotection.
AIMS: Remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) has been shown to reduce myocardial infarct size in patients. Our objective was to investigate whether the combination of RIC with either exenatide or glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) is more effective than RIC alone. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pigs were submitted to 40 min of coronary occlusion followed by reperfusion, and received (i) no treatment, (ii) one of the following treatments: RIC (5 min ischemia/5 min reperfusion × 4), GIK, or exenatide (at doses reducing infarct size in clinical trials), or (iii) a combination of two of these treatments (RIC + GIK or RIC + exenatide). After 5 min of reperfusion (n = 4/group), prominent phosphorylation of Akt and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) was observed, both in control and reperfused myocardium, in animals receiving GIK, and mitochondria from these hearts showed reduced ADP-stimulated respiration. (1)H NMR-based metabonomics disclosed a shift towards increased glycolysis in GIK and exenatide groups. In contrast, oxidative stress (myocardial nitrotyrosine levels) and eNOS uncoupling were significantly reduced only by RIC. In additional experiments (n = 7-10/group), ANOVA demonstrated a significant effect of the number of treatments after 2 h of reperfusion on infarct size (triphenyltetrazolium, % of the area at risk; 59.21 ± 3.34, 36.64 ± 3.03, and 21.04 ± 2.38% for none, one, and two treatments, respectively), and significant differences between one and two treatments (P = 0.004) but not among individual treatments or between RIC + GIK and RIC + exenatide. CONCLUSIONS: GIK and exenatide activate cardioprotective pathways different from those of RIC, and have additive effects with RIC on infarct size reduction in pigs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alburquerque-Béjar et al. (2015) studied Myocardial infarction. Combination of remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) with GIK or exenatide vs. No treatment or single treatments (RIC, GIK, or exenatide alone) was evaluated on Infarct size (% of the area at risk) (p=0.004). Combining remote ischaemic conditioning with either GIK or exenatide significantly reduced myocardial infarct size compared to single treatments (21.04% vs 36.64%; P=0.004) in pigs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: