Key result
Brief family-centered education linked to ~75% more weekly MVPA among childhood cancer survivors.
Why the study?
Childhood cancer survivors face elevated risk of long-term cardiopulmonary complications but have low physical activity, and scalable evidence-based interventions in routine care are limited.
Does a brief, family-centered educational intervention improve physical activity behaviors in childhood cancer survivors?
Does a brief, family-centered educational intervention improve physical activity behaviors in childhood cancer survivors?
Absolute Event Rate: 172.3% vs 98.5%
p-value: p=0.004
Supports educational strategies for activity in survivors; hypothesis-generating pending randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at increased risk of long-term cardiopulmonary and functional complications, but physical activity participation remains low. Scalable, evidence-based interventions integrated into routine survivorship care are limited, especially in low- and middle-income settings. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a brief, family-centered educational intervention in improving physical activity behaviors and exercise-related cognition among CCS in China. PROCEDURE: We conducted a mixed-methods, single-arm educational intervention involving CCS and their caregivers. Baseline assessments (T0) and follow-up assessments conducted 1-3 months after the intervention (T1) evaluated three major outcome domains: (i) physical activity behaviors, assessed using the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ) and selected Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children/Adolescents (PAQ-C/A) items, including moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and total physical activity; (ii) exercise-related cognitive constructs, assessed using Health Belief Model (HBM)-based measures and selected Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale (EBBS) items; and (iii) family support and parental awareness regarding exercise and treatment-related health risks. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to further explore perceptions and experiences related to physical activity participation. RESULTS: A total of 106 CCS completed T0 and 78 (73.6%) completed T1; 18 participated in interviews. At baseline, most survivors reported low physical activity levels and exercise-related fatigue during vigorous activity. Following the intervention, physical activity behaviors improved significantly, with increases in weekly MVPA (from 98.5 to 172.3 min/week; p = 0.004), total physical activity (from 166.6 to 318.0 min/week; p < 0.001), and GLTEQ scores (from 40.4 to 56.0; p = 0.005). Exercise-related cognition also improved, including greater perceived severity of insufficient physical activity, and increased perceived energy and vitality benefits of exercise. Parental awareness of cardiopulmonary risk increased from 50.0% to 71.8% (p = 0.003). Family support behaviors improved, including parental encouragement (p = 0.016), family co-exercise (p = 0.006), and caregivers' own exercise habits (p = 0.008). Qualitative interviews highlighted the importance of medical guidance, family involvement, individualized exercise recommendations, and concerns regarding fatigue and safety. CONCLUSIONS: A brief, family-centered educational intervention was associated with improved physical activity behaviors, enhanced exercise-related cognition, increased parental awareness, and stronger family support among childhood cancer survivors. These findings support the feasibility and potential value of integrating scalable exercise education into routine survivorship care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cai et al. (2026) studied Childhood cancer survivors (n=106). Brief, family-centered educational intervention vs. Baseline (pre-intervention) was evaluated on Weekly moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) (p=0.004). A brief, family-centered educational intervention significantly increased weekly moderate-to-vigorous physical activity from 98.5 to 172.3 min/week (p=0.004) among childhood cancer survivors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: