Key result
Multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention reduces BMI z-score by ~15% in overweight childhood cancer survivors.
Why the study?
Childhood cancer survivors face an increased risk of obesity and cardiometabolic complications, but evidence for multidisciplinary lifestyle interventions, especially in LMICs, remains limited with poorly understood long-term adherence.
Does a structured multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention improve BMI z-score and functional outcomes in overweight and obese childhood cancer survivors?
Does a structured multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention improve BMI z-score and functional outcomes in overweight and obese childhood cancer survivors?
p-value: p=0.01
A multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention is feasible and modestly improves BMI and functional endurance in overweight and obese childhood cancer survivors in LMIC settings, though adherence wanes without ongoing reinforcement.
May support MD lifestyle intervention feasibility in LMIC CCS; leaves open efficacy and adherence in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at increased risk of obesity and related cardiometabolic complications. Evidence for multidisciplinary (MD) lifestyle interventions in CCS, particularly from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), remains limited, and long-term adherence is poorly understood. METHODS: We conducted a prospective single-arm interventional study among overweight and obese CCS attending a survivorship clinic at a tertiary cancer centre between January 2021 and June 2022. Participants received a structured MD intervention including dietary counselling, physical activity guidance and psychological support, with telephonic reinforcement up to 24 weeks. Outcomes assessed at 1 year included BMI z-score, physical activity, functional endurance (6-min walk test), dietary intake and sedentary behaviour. Factors associated with response were explored using logistic regression. RESULTS: Sixty CCS (median age 15 years) were enrolled. At 1 year, mean BMI z-score decreased modestly from 2.13 ± 0.69 to 1.8 ± 0.7 (p = 0.01). Significant improvements were observed in physical activity levels, 6-min walk distance (507.8-600 m, p < 0.001) and sedentary time (11.5-9.0 h/day, p < 0.001). Dietary patterns showed reduced caloric and fat intake with improved protein consumption. Adherence to intervention components declined progressively after cessation of structured reinforcement at 24 weeks. Younger age and lower BMI at cancer diagnosis were associated with better response. CONCLUSIONS: MD lifestyle interventions integrated into survivorship care are feasible in an LMIC setting and improved behavioural and functional outcomes, with modest reduction in BMI. Declining adherence over time emphasises need for sustained reinforcement strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kapoor et al. (2026) studied Overweight and obese childhood cancer survivors (n=60). Multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention was evaluated on BMI z-score (p=0.01). A multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention in overweight and obese childhood cancer survivors reduced mean BMI z-score from 2.13 to 1.8 (p=0.01) at 1 year.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: