Ethnographic examination of forced marriage narratives reveals prior abuse’s influence on parenting choices.
This paper is concerned with the distortions that arise from a temporal privileging of the UK’s Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007. It raises questions around contextualizing “forced marriage” within other forms of force and abuse both before and after the act of “forced marriage” itself. Such context is called for particularly because, on numerous occasions, informants prefaced their stories about their marriage with narratives about prior abuse. The argument of this piece is to find ways to think with my informants about this abuse, to present it ethnographically, and to navigate through their accounts the ways in which these experiences have propelled them toward making decisions and choices with regards to the care of their own children to remake those histories and generate alternative futures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perveez Mody (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: