Comparative analysis reveals a need for empirical research on forced marriage in Germany, Spain, Finland, and Ireland, suggesting a law shift for prevention.
This paper explores forced marriage, a form of gender-based violence affecting women and girls worldwide. It employs a comparative approach, beginning with the victim-centred focus outlined in the Istanbul Convention. The paper analyses forced marriage data and legislative frameworks in Germany, Spain, Finland, and Ireland. It concludes that more empirical research is needed for effective prevention and recommends a shift from criminal to civil and family law, as the current approach overly narrows the concept of forced marriage. Enhanced institutional attention across all four countries is also crucial for ensuring victims’ access to justice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Villacampa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: