Key result
A community-based hypertension intervention reached 60% of the target population, but only 27% of clinic attendees were retained in care and 33% of those achieved blood pressure control.
Why the study?
Does a multi-component community-based intervention improve hypertension management and what are the associated costs in an urban slum in Kenya?
Observational (n=4,049)
Does a multi-component community-based intervention improve hypertension management and what are the associated costs in an urban slum in Kenya?
Low retention and control despite reach caution against scale-up; leaves open whether retention-focused refinements can improve outcomes in similar settings.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the processes, outcomes and costs of implementing a multi-component, community-based intervention for hypertension among adults aged > 35 years in a large slum in Nairobi, Kenya. METHODS: The intervention in 2012-2013 was based on four components: awareness-raising; improved access to screening; standardized clinical management of hypertension; and long-term retention in care. Using multiple sources of data, including administrative records and surveys, we described the inputs and outputs of each intervention activity and estimated the outcomes of each component and the impact of the intervention. We also estimated the costs associated with implementation, using a top-down costing approach. FINDINGS: The intervention reached 60% of the target population (4049/6780 people), at a cost of 17 United States dollars (US$) per person screened and provided access to treatment for 68% (660/976) of people referred, at a cost of US$ 123 per person with hypertension who attended the clinic. Of the 660 people who attended the clinic, 27% (178) were retained in care, at a cost of US$ 194 per person retained; and of those patients, 33% (58/178) achieved blood pressure control. The total intervention cost per patient with blood pressure controlled was US$ 3205. CONCLUSION: With moderate implementation costs, it was possible to achieve hypertension awareness and treatment levels comparable to those in high-income settings. However, retention in care and blood pressure control were challenges in this slum setting. For patients, the costs and lack of time or forgetfulness were barriers to retention in care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oti et al. (2016) conducted an observational in hypertension (n=4,049). Multi-component, community-based intervention for hypertension was evaluated on Implementation outcomes including population reach, access to treatment, retention in care, blood pressure control, and associated costs. A community-based hypertension intervention reached 60% of the target population, but only 27% of clinic attendees were retained in care and 33% of those achieved blood pressure control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: