Key result
Computed coronary tomography angiography showed high diagnostic performance for CAD screening before TAVI, with 89.6% sensitivity, 90.2% specificity, and 97.7% negative predictive value.
Why the study?
CAD screening before TAVI is usually performed with invasive coronary angiography, but CCTA could be an efficient non-invasive alternative in patients without known CAD.
Does CCTA provide reliable diagnostic performance compared to ICA for CAD screening in patients without known CAD who are candidates for TAVI?
Observational (n=307)
No
Does CCTA provide reliable diagnostic performance compared to ICA for CAD screening in patients without known CAD who are candidates for TAVI?
CCTA is a reliable alternative to ICA for CAD screening in TAVI candidates without known CAD, potentially avoiding ICA in nearly 75% of patients.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) screening is usually performed before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) by invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Computed coronary tomography angiography (CCTA) has shown good diagnostic performance for CAD screening in patients with a low probability of CAD and is systematically performed before TAVI. CCTA could be an efficient alternative to ICA for CAD screening before TAVI. We sought to investigate the diagnostic performance of CCTA in a population of unselected patients without known CAD who were candidates for TAVI. All consecutive patients referred to our center for TAVI without known CAD were enrolled. All patients underwent CCTA and ICA, which were considered the gold standard. A statistical analysis of the diagnostic performance per patient and per artery was performed. 307 consecutive patients were enrolled. CCTA was non-analyzable in 25 patients (8.9%). In the per-patient analysis, CCTA had a sensitivity of 89.6%, a specificity of 90.2%, a positive predictive value of 65.15%, and a negative predictive value of 97.7%. Only five patients were classified as false negatives on the CCTA. Despite some limitations of the study, CCTA seems reliable for CAD screening in patients without known CAD who are candidates for TAVI. By using CCTA, ICA could be avoided in patients with a CAD-RADS score ≤ 2, which represents 74.8% of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boyer et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation without known coronary artery disease (n=307). Computed coronary tomography angiography (CCTA) vs. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was evaluated on Diagnostic performance for CAD screening (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV). Computed coronary tomography angiography showed high diagnostic performance for CAD screening before TAVI, with 89.6% sensitivity, 90.2% specificity, and 97.7% negative predictive value.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: