Key result
Chronic strength duration curves were shifted upward and to the right of acute curves, suggesting that variable pulse width exceeding 1 ms may not significantly reduce stimulation thresholds.
Why the study?
How do chronic strength duration curves compare to acute strength duration curves in patients with cardiac pacemakers?
Population
47 patients undergoing pacemaker generator replacement and 19 patients at the time of initial pacemaker…
Comparison
Measurement of chronic strength duration curves… vs Acute strength duration curves measured at the…
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
Caution advised against assuming benefit from longer pulse widths in chronic implants; extends acute observations but remains hypothesis-generating.
Observational (n=66)
How do chronic strength duration curves compare to acute strength duration curves in patients with cardiac pacemakers?
Chronic pacemaker stimulation thresholds are shifted upward and to the right compared to acute thresholds, suggesting that increasing pulse width beyond 1 ms may not significantly reduce stimulation thresholds.
Hynes et al. (1981) conducted an observational in Cardiac pacemaker therapy (n=66). Chronic pacemaker leads (at generator replacement) vs. Acute pacemaker leads (at initial implantation) was evaluated on Strength duration curves (stimulation thresholds as a function of impulse duration). Chronic strength duration curves were shifted upward and to the right of acute curves, suggesting that variable pulse width exceeding 1 ms may not significantly reduce stimulation thresholds.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: