Key result
Elevated central systolic blood pressure was associated with a significantly higher prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy compared to normal central systolic blood pressure (35.2% vs 18.5%, p=0.002) in children with primary hypertension.
Why the study?
Does pulse wave analysis predict left ventricular hypertrophy in children with primary hypertension?
Cross-Sectional (n=294)
No
Does pulse wave analysis predict left ventricular hypertrophy in children with primary hypertension?
Absolute Event Rate: 35.2% vs 18.5%
p-value: p=0.002
Pulse wave analysis (central systolic and pulse pressure) is complementary to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for predicting left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive adolescents.
May support central BP assessment alongside ABPM for LVH risk in hypertensive children; hypothesis-generating and needs prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Central systolic and pulse pressures are stronger predictors of cardiovascular risk and hypertensive organ damage than brachial blood pressure. It is suggested that isolated systolic hypertension typically seen in adolescents is associated with normal central blood pressure and does not lead to organ damage and this phenomenon is called spurious hypertension. METHODS: We assessed the prevalence of spurious hypertension and analyzed utility of pulse wave analysis as determinant of hypertensive organ damage in 294 children (62 girls; 15.0 ± 2.4 years) diagnosed as primary hypertension. White coat hypertension, ambulatory prehypertension, ambulatory hypertension, and severe ambulatory hypertension were diagnosed in 127, 29, 41, and 97 patients, respectively. RESULTS: Normal central blood pressure was found in 100% in patients with white coat hypertension, 93% in pre-hypertensives, 51.2% in those with ambulatory hypertension, and 27.8% with severe ambulatory hypertension (p = 0.0001). Children with severe ambulatory hypertension had higher central systolic and pulse pressure, pulse wave velocity, and greater prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy than white coat and prehypertensive children (p < 0.05). Left ventricular mass index and carotid intima-media thickness correlated with central systolic and pulse pressure (p < 0.05 for all). Receiver operating curve area was similar for augmentation pressure (0.5836), 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (0.5841), central systolic blood pressure (0.6090), and central pulse pressure (0.5611) as predictors of left ventricular hypertrophy. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that pulse wave analysis is complementary to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in assessment of risk of organ damage in hypertensive adolescents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Litwin et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Primary hypertension (n=294). Elevated central systolic blood pressure vs. Normal central systolic blood pressure was evaluated on Left ventricular hypertrophy (p=0.002). Elevated central systolic blood pressure was associated with a significantly higher prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy compared to normal central systolic blood pressure (35.2% vs 18.5%, p=0.002) in children with primary hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: