Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to assess whether the polymorphism of the nucleotide excision repair enzyme, excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 1 (ERCC1), had an effect on the tumor response in patients treated with standard chemotherapy regimens for a metastatic colorectal cancer. We have studied the synonymous polymorphism that causes a single nucleotide change C to T at codon 118 converting a codon of common usage (AAC) to a less used codon (AAT), both coding asparagine. This change results in a decreased ERCC1 gene expression, which impairs repair activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Ninety-one patients with a median age of 55.1 years treated for a metastatic colorectal cancer were included in our retrospective study. The ERCC1 polymorphism was analyzed in the normal tissue of all patients. RESULTS: Twenty (22%) were homozygous for AAC codon (C/C genotype), 30 were (33%) homozygous for AAT codon (T/T genotype), and 41 (45%) were heterozygous (C/T genotype). The objective response rate to oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was significantly higher in the T/T genotype group compared with the C/T and the C/C genotype groups (61.9%, 42.3%, and 21.4%, respectively; P = 0.018). By contrast, no significant difference was observed when patients were treated with either 5-FU alone (45%, 29.2%, and 33.3%, respectively; P = 0.407) or in combination with irinotecan (46.1%, 25.0%, and 27.3%, respectively; P = 0.305). CONCLUSIONS: Our observations allowed us to define the first useful predictive criterion for oxaliplatin/5-FU response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Viguier et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: