Key result
Magnetic resonance imaging and 64-section multi-detector row computed tomography provide valuable noninvasive information for the comprehensive assessment of cardiac valve morphology and function.
Why the study?
How can MR imaging and 64-section multi-detector row CT be used to assess cardiac valve morphologic features and function?
Comparison
Magnetic resonance imaging and 64-section… vs Echocardiography (historical/standard)
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
May expand noninvasive valve assessment options beyond echocardiography; leaves open comparative accuracy and outcome data.
How can MR imaging and 64-section multi-detector row CT be used to assess cardiac valve morphologic features and function?
MR imaging and 64-section multi-detector row CT provide valuable adjunctive information for the noninvasive assessment of cardiac valve morphology and function.
Vogel‐Claussen et al. (2006) conducted a review in Cardiac valve assessment. MR Imaging and 64-Section Multi-Detector Row CT was evaluated. Magnetic resonance imaging and 64-section multi-detector row computed tomography provide valuable noninvasive information for the comprehensive assessment of cardiac valve morphology and function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: