Key result
Combining pulse transit time with heart rate improved the goodness of fit for estimating oxygen uptake (R12 0.771 vs 0.745), cardiac output, and stroke volume compared to heart rate alone.
Why the study?
Does combining pulse transit time with heart rate improve the non-invasive estimation of cardiac output, stroke volume, and oxygen uptake during exercise in healthy young subjects?
Observational (n=15)
No
Does combining pulse transit time with heart rate improve the non-invasive estimation of cardiac output, stroke volume, and oxygen uptake during exercise in healthy young subjects?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.771% vs 0.745%
Combining pulse transit time with heart rate using wearable sensors improves the non-invasive estimation of cardiac output, stroke volume, and oxygen uptake during exercise compared to heart rate alone.
PTT may enable portable exercise hemodynamics assessment beyond HR; leaves open validation before clinical or training use.
Heart rate (HR) is a valuable and widespread measure for physical training programs, although its description of conditioning is limited to the cardiac response to exercise. More comprehensive measures of exercise adaptation include cardiac output (Q̇), stroke volume (SV) and oxygen uptake (V̇O2), but these physiological parameters can be measured only with cumbersome equipment installed in clinical settings. In this work, we explore the ability of pulse transit time (PTT) to represent a valuable pairing with HR for indirectly estimating Q̇, SV and V̇O2 non-invasively. PTT was measured as the time interval between the peak of the electrocardiographic (ECG) R-wave and the onset of the photoplethysmography (PPG) waveform at the periphery (i.e. fingertip) with a portable sensor. Fifteen healthy young subjects underwent a graded incremental cycling protocol after which HR and PTT were correlated with Q̇, SV and V̇O2 using linear mixed models. The addition of PTT significantly improved the modeling of Q̇, SV and V̇O2 at the individual level ([Formula: see text] for SV, 0.548 for Q̇, and 0.771 for V̇O2) compared to predictive models based solely on HR ([Formula: see text] for SV, 0.503 for Q̇, and 0.745 for V̇O2). While challenges in sensitivity and artifact rejection exist, combining PTT with HR holds potential for development of novel wearable sensors that provide exercise assessment largely superior to HR monitors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pollonini et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=15). Pulse transit time (PTT) combined with heart rate vs. Heart rate alone was evaluated on Goodness of fit (R12) for modeling oxygen uptake (VO2). Combining pulse transit time with heart rate improved the goodness of fit for estimating oxygen uptake (R12 0.771 vs 0.745), cardiac output, and stroke volume compared to heart rate alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: