Key result
Eccentric cycling resulted in similar muscle oxygenation profiles compared to concentric cycling, despite requiring ~2.5 times higher mechanical power output (210±40 W vs. 82±16 W).
Why the study?
Does eccentric cycling compared to concentric cycling alter muscle oxygenation profiles in healthy men?
Does eccentric cycling compared to concentric cycling alter muscle oxygenation profiles in healthy men?
Muscle oxygenation responses during prolonged low-intensity exercise are not affected by the type of muscle action (eccentric vs. concentric) when matched for metabolic demand and cardiac output.
Similar muscle oxygenation at matched metabolic demand during low-intensity ECC vs CON warrants caution assuming greater eccentric training impulse; leaves open differential adaptation mechanisms.
Muscle deoxygenation responses provide information about the training impulse of an exercise session enabling adaptation to be predicted. Our aim was to investigate muscle oxygenation profiles during prolonged low-intensity eccentric and concentric cycling. Twelve healthy men performed two 45-min exercise sessions of concentric (CON) and eccentric (ECC) cycling, matched for the same heart rate at the start of each session. Mechanical power output during ECC was ~2.5 times that of CON (210±40 W vs. 82±16 W). Oxygen uptake, blood lactate, cardiac output and systolic arterial pressure responses did not differ between exercises. Heart rate was similar at 5 min of each exercise bout but progressively increased during ECC and was higher at 15, 30 and 45 min of ECC compared to CON (+10 bpm), with a trend for a lower stroke volume. Diastolic and mean blood pressures were higher during ECC. No significant differences were observed in muscle oxygenation profiles. Muscle oxygenation responses during prolonged low-intensity exercise were not affected by the type of muscle action at the same metabolic demand and cardiac output.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rakobowchuk et al. (2018) studied Healthy (n=12). Eccentric cycling vs. Concentric cycling was evaluated on Muscle oxygenation profiles. Eccentric cycling resulted in similar muscle oxygenation profiles compared to concentric cycling, despite requiring ~2.5 times higher mechanical power output (210±40 W vs. 82±16 W).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: