Key result
Having a spouse with ideal cardiovascular health significantly increased the odds of achieving ideal cardiovascular health for both husbands (OR 1.49) and wives (OR 1.46).
Why the study?
It was unknown whether a spouse's cardiovascular health metrics status affects the other spouse's ideal cardiovascular health in a nationwide representative population.
Does a spouse's cardiovascular health status associate with the other spouse's odds of having ideal cardiovascular health in Korean married couples?
Cross-Sectional (n=12,060)
Does a spouse's cardiovascular health status associate with the other spouse's odds of having ideal cardiovascular health in Korean married couples?
Odds Ratio: 1.49 (95% CI 1.27–1.69)
Absolute Event Rate: 23.7% vs 15.4%
There is a significant spousal concordance of ideal cardiovascular health metrics in Korean married couples, suggesting that couple-based interventions may be an effective strategy for cardiovascular disease prevention.
Spousal CVH interdependence may exist; leaves open whether couple-targeted interventions improve ideal metrics.
BACKGROUNDS: We aimed to investigate whether a spouse's cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics status affects the other spouse's ideal CVH using a Korea nationwide representative survey. METHODS: We used the health data of 6,030 married couples who participated in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2014 to 2019. The CVH was defined using seven metrics: smoking status, blood pressure, body mass index, total cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, physical activity, and diet, following the American Heart Association guidelines and modifications for body mass index cutoffs and diet quality. The CVH score was calculated on a scale ranging from 0 to 7, with the ideal CVH defined as attaining ideal scores in at least five CVH metrics. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to assess whether husband's ideal CVH was associated with his wife's odds for having ideal CVH, and vice versa. RESULTS: The mean CVH scores were 3.2 and 4.0 for husband and wife, respectively. After fully adjusting for age and education of both partners and household income, husbands had 1.49 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-1.69) higher odds of achieving ideal CVH if their wives had also achieved ideal CVH. Meanwhile, wives whose husbands achieved ideal CVH also had 1.46 times (95% CI, 1.27-1.69) higher odds of achieving ideal CVH. Nonsmoking (57.17%), ideal fasting blood glucose level (34.93%), and ideal diet intake (24.18%) were the most concordant CVH metrics among spouses. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found a significant spousal concordance of ideal CVH in Korean married couples. This finding supports the use of a couple-based interventional strategy targeted to promote CVH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thang et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular health (n=12,060). Spouse achieving ideal cardiovascular health vs. Spouse not achieving ideal cardiovascular health was evaluated on Husband achieving ideal cardiovascular health (CVH score ≥ 5) (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.27-1.69). Having a spouse with ideal cardiovascular health significantly increased the odds of achieving ideal cardiovascular health for both husbands (OR 1.49) and wives (OR 1.46).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: