Key result
Male partners meeting ≥5 ideal cardiovascular components are linked to ~60% higher odds of females matching.
Why the study?
Clinical evidence on AHA-defined cardiovascular health metrics among couples remains scarce.
Cross-Sectional (n=174,320)
Odds Ratio: 1.6 (95% CI 1.6–1.7)
p-value: p=<0.001
There is a significant intracouple correlation in cardiovascular health metrics, highlighting the potential value of couple-based interventions for improving cardiovascular health.
May support couple-based CV health screening; hypothesis-generating for partner-targeted intervention trials.
AIM: Clinical evidence on cardiovascular health metrics of couples, as defined by the American Heart Association (AHA), remains to be scarce. This study aims to explore the correlation of the AHA-defined cardiovascular health metrics within couples using a nationwide epidemiological database. METHODS: , (3) physical activity at goal, (4) untreated blood pressure <120/80 mm Hg, (5) untreated fasting glucose <100 mg/dL, and (6) untreated total cholesterol <200 mg/dL. RESULTS: A correlation was noted on the ideal modified cardiovascular health metrics between couples. The prevalence of meeting ≥ 5 ideal components in the female partners increased from 32 % in the male partners meeting 0-1 ideal component to 56 % in those meeting 6 ideal components. The same trend has been observed in all generations (20-39 years, 40-49 years, 50-59 years, ≥ 60 years). The association between couples is found to be better in terms of smoking status, blood pressure, and fasting glucose level. CONCLUSION: There was an intracouple correlation of the ideal modified cardiovascular health metrics, suggesting the importance of couple-based intervention to improve cardiovascular health status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaneko et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular health (n=174,320). Male partner meeting ≥ 5 ideal cardiovascular health components vs. Male partner meeting < 5 ideal cardiovascular health components was evaluated on Female partner meeting ≥ 5 ideal cardiovascular health components (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.6-1.7, p=<0.001). Having a male partner who met 5 or more ideal cardiovascular health components was significantly associated with the female partner also meeting 5 or more ideal components (OR 1.6).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: