Key result
The thoracic inlet left atrial score (TILAS) accurately distinguished dogs with cardiac enlargement secondary to mitral valve disease (AUC 0.91), comparable to VLAS, M-VLAS, and RLAD.
Why the study?
The study aimed to assess the clinical utility of measuring canine left atrial size on right thoracic X-rays using the thoracic inlet as a reference and to determine if it could differentiate dogs in different mitral valve disease stages.
Does the thoracic inlet left atrial score (TILAS) accurately distinguish dogs with cardiac enlargement secondary to mitral valve disease compared to other radiographic methods?
Observational (n=136)
Does the thoracic inlet left atrial score (TILAS) accurately distinguish dogs with cardiac enlargement secondary to mitral valve disease compared to other radiographic methods?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.91
The thoracic inlet left atrial score (TILAS) is a reliable radiographic method, comparable to existing methods, for identifying cardiac enlargement in dogs with mitral valve disease.
TI may serve as a reliable radiographic reference for LAS in canine MVD; leaves open prospective validation against echocardiography.
The left atrial size increases (LAS) in patients with mitral valve disease (MVD) as the disease progresses. The vertebral left atrial size (VLAS), the modified-vertebral left atrial size (M-VLAS), and the radiographic left atrial dimension (RLAD) are methods reported to assess LAS on dogs' radiographs. All these methods transform the LAS into vertebral units. The thoracic inlet (TI) has been used as a reliable reference point to measure the cardiac silhouette of dogs with MVD in different stages. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical utility of measuring a dog LAS on right thoracic X-rays using the TI as a reference and determine whether it could differentiate dogs in different MVD stages. LAS was divided by the TI to obtain the thoracic inlet left atrial score (TILAS). This was a retrospective observational study including 135 apparently healthy dogs performed to assess their LAS with four different methods: VLAS, M-VLAS, RLAD, and TILAS. Thirty-six dogs from the general population were selected and compared to 100 dogs in different MVD stages. The TILAS was significantly different between the control dogs and MVD dogs, increasing with the disease stage: control dogs 0.51 ± 0.08, B1 0.57 ± 0.14, B2 0.75 ± 0.13, and C 0.84 ± 0.18. VLAS, M-VLAS, and RLAD also increased as the disease progressed, as shown in previous studies. The TILAS accuracy to distinguish MVD dogs with cardiac enlargement was comparable to VLAS, M-VLAS, and RLAD (AUC 0.91 vs. 0.93, 0.90, and 0.94 respectively). A TILAS > 0.8 can identify dogs with cardiac enlargement secondary to MVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernández et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Mitral valve disease (MVD) (n=136). Thoracic inlet left atrial score (TILAS) vs. VLAS, M-VLAS, and RLAD was evaluated on Accuracy to distinguish MVD dogs with cardiac enlargement (AUC 0.91). The thoracic inlet left atrial score (TILAS) accurately distinguished dogs with cardiac enlargement secondary to mitral valve disease (AUC 0.91), comparable to VLAS, M-VLAS, and RLAD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: