Key result
A systematic review of 5 trials found that a 30-mL/min creatinine clearance cutoff is not justified to select individuals at increased risk of accumulation when low-molecular-weight heparin is used.
Why the study?
Does impaired renal function contraindicate the use of low-molecular-weight heparin in nondialyzed patients?
Population
Nondialyzed patients with varying degrees of renal function
Comparison
Low-molecular-weight heparin preparations vs Patients with different degrees of renal function
Design
Systematic_review
Authors
Loading...
May warrant caution with LMWH in severe renal impairment; leaves open need for RCTs on dosing and monitoring.
Systematic Review
Does impaired renal function contraindicate the use of low-molecular-weight heparin in nondialyzed patients?
A 30-mL/min creatinine clearance cutoff is not justified as a universal contraindication for LMW heparins, as pharmacokinetic responses vary among preparations, with tinzaparin showing no accumulation down to 20 mL/min.
Nagge et al. (2002) conducted a systematic review in Impaired renal function. Low-molecular-weight heparin was evaluated on Pharmacokinetics and accumulation of anti-factor Xa activity. A systematic review of 5 trials found that a 30-mL/min creatinine clearance cutoff is not justified to select individuals at increased risk of accumulation when low-molecular-weight heparin is used.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: