In-Hospital Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Among Cancer Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide U.S. Study

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently observed in cancer patients, driven by mutual comorbidities and increasing the risk of thromboembolic events. Impediments can hinder the utilization of anticoagulants among patients with malignancy—drug interactions with chemotherapy, renal dysfunction, drug intolerance, and increased bleeding risk. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an effective and safe non-pharmacological approach to prevent thromboembolic complications when anticoagulants are not suitable. Cancer patients were generally excluded from the original LAAO trials, and current safety and efficacy in cancer patients remain uncertain. Methods: This retrospective study utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to analyze in-hospital outcomes of LAAO in US patients with and without cancer between 2016 and 2019. Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedures, and in-hospital outcomes were extracted using ICD-10-CM codes. Results: Among 12,273 hospitalizations for LAAO across the US representing an estimated 61,365 LAAO procedures, 2.2% (1365 cases) were performed in cancer patients. Older age, male gender, chronic kidney disease, prior stroke, and anemia were more prevalent in the cancer group, with 785 (58%) having a solid malignancy and 580 (42%) having a hematologic malignancy. Compared to non-cancer patients, cancer patients exhibited a higher rate of in-hospital complications (8.8% vs. 5.7%; p < 0.001), primarily driven by acute kidney injury (4.4% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.002), acute heart failure (3.7% vs. 2.6%; p = 0.012), and cardiac tamponade (1.5% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.006). No significant differences were observed in vascular complications, periprocedural stroke, or in-hospital mortality. Average length of stay (LOS) was longer in cancer patients (1.4 ± 2.7 days vs. 1.8 ± 2.5 days; p < 0.001). Conclusions: This nationwide study found that cancer patients undergoing LAAO had an increased rate of in-hospital complications, particularly acute kidney injury, heart failure, and tamponade, but no increase in in-hospital mortality was observed. Further research is needed to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of LAAO for managing embolic prevention in this complex patient population.