Why the study?
Does gender impact the 24-month clinical outcomes of patients with ACS treated with titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stents versus everolimus-eluting stents?
RCT (n=827)
randomly assigned
Does gender impact the 24-month clinical outcomes of patients with ACS treated with titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stents versus everolimus-eluting stents?
Absolute Event Rate: 15.2% vs 11%
p-value: p=0.13
Women undergoing PCI for ACS may have a slightly higher risk of nonfatal MI at 24 months compared to men, particularly when treated with everolimus-eluting stents.
Women may face higher nonfatal MI risk post-ACS stenting; leaves open gender-tailored stent strategies pending dedicated trials.
AIMS: The randomized comparison of titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stent with everolimus-eluting stent in acute coronary syndrome (BASE-ACS) trial demonstrated an outcome of the titanium-nitride-oxide coated bioactive stents (BASs) that was statistically noninferior to that of the everolimus-eluting stents (EESs) at 12-month follow-up, in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent early percutaneous coronary intervention. We performed a post-hoc gender-based analysis of the BASE-ACS trial at 24-month follow-up. METHODS: A total of 827 patients (198 women) with ACS were randomly assigned to receive either BAS or EES. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: Women were older, and more likely to have diabetes and hypertension compared with men (P < 0.05 for all). Moreover, women had significantly smaller reference vessel diameter and stent diameter (P < 0.05 for all). At 24-month follow-up, the cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint was similar between the two sex subgroups (15.2 versus 11.0%, for women versus men, respectively, P = 0.13). However, the rate of nonfatal MI was significantly higher in women compared with men (8.6 versus 3.8%, respectively, P = 0.007). After propensity score-adjusted analysis, there was a trend toward more nonfatal MI among women (8.6 versus 4.0%, respectively, P = 0.08). Moreover, among male patients, those assigned to BAS had significantly lower nonfatal MI compared with those assigned to EES (P = 0.027). However, among patients assigned to EES, female patients had a significantly higher rate of nonfatal MI compared with men (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In the current post-hoc gender-based analysis of the BASE-ACS trial, the 24-month outcome of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ACS was slightly worse in women, compared with men, as reflected by a trend toward more nonfatal MI events after propensity score-adjusted analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sia et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Acute coronary syndrome (n=827). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (p=0.13).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: