Key result
Pulsed-wave Doppler myocardial imaging of mitral annular motion correlated with radionuclide ejection fraction (r=0.55 for medial, r=0.54 for lateral; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does pulsed-wave Doppler myocardial imaging of mitral annular motion accurately estimate global left ventricular function compared to radionuclide ventriculography?
Population
51 patients with a radionuclide ejection fraction of 52 +/- 13%
Comparison
Pulsed-wave Doppler myocardial imaging of mitral… vs Radionuclide ventriculography (reference standard)
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
Mitral annular velocities correlate only modestly with EF; leaves open their role as a reliable echocardiographic surrogate pending larger validation studies.
Cross-Sectional (n=51)
Does pulsed-wave Doppler myocardial imaging of mitral annular motion accurately estimate global left ventricular function compared to radionuclide ventriculography?
Effect estimate: Correlation 0.55 (medial) and 0.54 (lateral)
p-value: p=< 0.001
Pulsed-wave Doppler myocardial imaging of mitral annular velocity provides a simple and clinically useful estimate of global left ventricular systolic function, particularly in patients without regional wall-motion abnormalities.
Vinereanu et al. (2002) conducted a cross-sectional in Left ventricular function assessment (n=51). Pulsed-wave Doppler myocardial imaging of mitral annular motion vs. Radionuclide ventriculography was evaluated on Correlation of peak systolic velocities of mitral annular motion with ejection fraction (Correlation 0.55 (medial) and 0.54 (lateral), p=< 0.001). Pulsed-wave Doppler myocardial imaging of mitral annular motion correlated with radionuclide ejection fraction (r=0.55 for medial, r=0.54 for lateral; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: