Key result
The transradial approach for coronary procedures reduces vascular complications compared to femoral access, though technical challenges require operator experience and technological advancement.
Why the study?
What are the technical challenges and tips for success when performing transradial coronary artery procedures?
What are the technical challenges and tips for success when performing transradial coronary artery procedures?
The transradial approach offers reduced vascular complications and early ambulation, and this review provides practical tips for operators to overcome its technical challenges.
Transradial access may reduce complications in coronary procedures; leaves open optimal use in complex contemporary cases.
Historically, the majority of coronary procedures have been performed via the femoral artery. However, since the inception of the transradial approach, a number of studies have confirmed that this technique is associated with a significant reduction in vascular complications, equivalent procedure times and radiation exposure to femoral procedures, the ability to perform complex coronary interventions, early ambulation and patient preference. Over the last decade, this has led to an exponential rise in the use of the transradial access site, with several potential technical challenges becoming increasingly recognised. However, with greater experience and technological advancement these potential obstacles may be overcome. The following review highlights the potential challenges and suggests several tips to assist transradial operators with recognising and overcoming these challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sandhu et al. (2017) conducted a review in Coronary artery procedures. Transradial approach vs. Femoral approach was evaluated. The transradial approach for coronary procedures reduces vascular complications compared to femoral access, though technical challenges require operator experience and technological advancement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: