Key result
Internal defibrillation shocks caused electroporation near the electrode, with significantly greater propidium iodide uptake in the left ventricular epicardium of infarcted rabbit hearts (P<0.01).
Why the study?
Does a 45-min recovery period after a 300-V defibrillation shock affect electroporation injury in normal and MI rabbit hearts?
Does a 45-min recovery period after a 300-V defibrillation shock affect electroporation injury in normal and MI rabbit hearts?
Defibrillation shocks cause electroporation concentrated near the shock electrode, with increased injury in the infarct border zone of MI hearts, and recovery of membrane integrity is a prolonged process.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Electroporation injury from defibrillation may be amplified in infarcted myocardium; hypothesis-generating for recovery timelines and clinical translation.
Defibrillation shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators can be lifesaving but can also damage cardiac tissues via electroporation. This study characterizes the spatial distribution and extent of defibrillation shock-induced electroporation with and without a 45-min postshock period for cell membranes to recover. Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts (n = 31) with and without a chronic left ventricular (LV) myocardial infarction (MI) were studied. Mean defibrillation threshold (DFT) was determined to be 161.4 ± 17.1 V and 1.65 ± 0.44 J in MI hearts for internally delivered 8-ms monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) shocks during sustained ventricular fibrillation (>20 s, SVF). A single 300-V MTE shock (twice determined DFT voltage) was used to terminate SVF. Shock-induced electroporation was assessed by propidium iodide (PI) uptake. Ventricular PI staining was quantified by fluorescent imaging. Histological analysis was performed using Masson's Trichrome staining. Results showed PI staining concentrated near the shock electrode in all hearts. Without recovery, PI staining was similar between normal and MI groups around the shock electrode and over the whole ventricles. However, MI hearts had greater total PI uptake in anterior (P < 0.01) and posterior (P < 0.01) LV epicardial regions. Postrecovery, PI staining was reduced substantially, but residual staining remained significant with similar spacial distributions. PI staining under SVF was similar to previously studied paced hearts. In conclusion, electroporation was spatially correlated with the active region of the shock electrode. Additional electroporation occurred in the LV epicardium of MI hearts, in the infarct border zone. Recovery of membrane integrity postelectroporation is likely a prolonged process. Short periods of SVF did not affect electroporation injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2012) studied Myocardial infarction and ventricular fibrillation (n=31). Internal defibrillation shock vs. Normal hearts / without recovery was evaluated on Shock-induced electroporation assessed by propidium iodide (PI) uptake (p=<0.01). Internal defibrillation shocks caused electroporation near the electrode, with significantly greater propidium iodide uptake in the left ventricular epicardium of infarcted rabbit hearts (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: