Key result
Acute vasoreactivity testing with O2 plus inhaled nitric oxide resulted in a >20% drop in pulmonary vascular resistance in 61% of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
Why the study?
Acute vasoreactivity testing is seldom performed routinely in CTEPH patients, leading to limited understanding of the frequency and significance of an acute vasodilator response.
Does acute vasoreactivity testing with O2 and O2 + iNO demonstrate significant vasodilator response in patients with CTEPH?
Observational (n=49)
Does acute vasoreactivity testing with O2 and O2 + iNO demonstrate significant vasodilator response in patients with CTEPH?
Acute vasoreactivity testing in CTEPH reveals significant variability in vascular tone, with 61% of patients showing a >20% drop in PVR with O2 and inhaled nitric oxide, suggesting a substantial vasoconstrictive component in addition to mechanical obstruction.
Suggests vasoconstrictive component in CTEPH; supports consensus but leaves open whether testing should guide vasodilator therapy.
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is believed to involve both vascular obstruction and vasoconstriction; hence, pulmonary vasodilators such as riociguat may be beneficial. Acute vasoreactivity testing (AVT) is seldom performed routinely in CTEPH patients, so there is limited understanding of the frequency and significance of an acute vasodilator response. Systematic vasodilator testing with oxygen (O 2 ) and oxygen plus inhaled nitric oxide (O 2 + iNO) was performed as part of the Pulmonary Vascular Disease Omics (PVDOMICS) NHLBI project, providing an opportunity to examine AVT responses in CTEPH. Patients with CTEPH enrolled in PVDOMICS ( n = 49, 40 with prevalent CTEPH [82%]) underwent right heart catheterization including AVT with O 2 and O 2 + iNO. Hemodynamics were obtained at baseline and with each challenge. Fourteen of 49 patients (29%) had >20% drop in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) with O 2 . With O 2 + iNO, 30/49 (61%) had >20% drop in PVR, 20% had >20% drop in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and PVR, and 8% had >10 mmHg decline in mPAP to mPAP < 40 with normal cardiac output. Patients on riociguat had less response to O 2 + iNO than patients on phosphodiesterase‐5 inhibitors. Our findings shed light on the significant variability in vascular tone that is present in CTEPH, confirming that CTEPH represents a combination of mechanical obstruction and vasoconstriction that appears similar to that observed with Group 1 PAH. Additional study regarding whether results of acute vasodilator testing predict response to therapy and relate to prognosis is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frantz et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) (n=49). Acute vasoreactivity testing with oxygen (O2) and oxygen plus inhaled nitric oxide (O2 + iNO) was evaluated on >20% drop in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Acute vasoreactivity testing with O2 plus inhaled nitric oxide resulted in a >20% drop in pulmonary vascular resistance in 61% of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: