Examines activity patterns predicting restlessness in terminally ill cancer patients, suggesting monitoring may help prevent exacerbation.
BACKGROUND: Restlessness is a common and distressing symptom in terminally ill patients with cancer. It is often described as a sudden phenomenon near death; however, its longitudinal progression has not been well characterized. AIM: To examine whether terminal restlessness that worsens suddenly is preceded by changes detectable based on continuous monitoring using a sheet-type nonwearable sensor device. METHODS: We conducted secondary analysis of a single-center prospective observational study in a Japanese palliative care unit (2019-2022). The severity of restlessness was measured as activity scores using a sheet-type nonwearable sensor device placed under the mattress. Group-based trajectory modeling was applied to night-time activity scores during the last 30 days of life. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) scores and medication use were compared across trajectory groups. RESULTS: Of the 1,209 enrolled patients, 959 were included in the final analysis (median age: 75 years, 55% male). A specific patient cluster showing acute exacerbation of terminal restlessness just before death was identified (model-estimated group proportion, 11.1%). In this group, RASS scores and rates of using antipsychotics and benzodiazepines in the final days were significantly higher compared with those in the other groups. Activity scores did not show a sudden increase immediately prior to death; a gradual upward trend was observed beginning approximately two weeks before death, preceding the terminal rise. CONCLUSION: Approximately 10% of patients experienced exacerbation of terminal restlessness just before death. Continuous monitoring with a non-invasive sensor device may enable earlier detection and prevent exacerbation of terminal restlessness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hirooka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: