Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows the relationship between tree-ring metrics and environmental factors, indicating new evaluation methods.
Tree-ring chronologies are essential proxies for investigating ecosystem dynamics and reconstructing environmental variability, yet integrative approaches for assessing chronology quality and sampling representativeness across heterogeneous regions remain limited. We analyzed 190 tree-ring chronologies distributed across Mexico and developed two composite indicators: the Signal Quality Index (SQI), integrating internal coherence, interannual sensitivity, common growth signal strength, and the Sampling Representativeness Index (SRI), quantifying the statistical adequacy of sampling efforts. Both indices were standardized and evaluated using Moran’s I, Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA), Getis–Ord Gi* hotspot analysis, and correlations with climatic, hydrological, and edaphic variables. Results revealed a marked decoupling between chronology signal quality and sampling representativeness. SQI exhibited significant positive spatial autocorrelation, with clusters of high and low values associated with hydroclimatic gradients. It was strongly related to indicators of water availability and atmospheric evaporative demand, suggesting greater growth coherence under water-limited conditions. In contrast, SRI displayed weak spatial structure and largely non-significant relationships with environmental variables, indicating that representativeness is driven primarily by methodological decisions and sampling design. These findings highlight complementary ecological (SQI) and methodological (SRI) dimensions of dendrochronological networks and provide a practical framework for improving chronology evaluation, comparability, and network development across environmentally heterogeneous regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodríguez-Flores et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: