Key result
Low-dose aspirin may offer net primary prevention benefit in high-risk patients with low bleeding risk.
Why the study?
Aspirin's role in CVD primary prevention remains controversial due to modest benefits balanced against bleeding risk, and significant heterogeneity persists in guideline-defined risk thresholds.
Does low-dose aspirin reduce cardiovascular events in individuals without prior cardiovascular events but with advanced subclinical atherosclerosis or high-risk markers?
Does low-dose aspirin reduce cardiovascular events in individuals without prior cardiovascular events but with advanced subclinical atherosclerosis or high-risk markers?
Aspirin for primary prevention may offer a net clinical benefit in selected patients with advanced subclinical atherosclerosis or high-risk markers when bleeding risk is low, requiring individualized decision-making.
Supports personalized aspirin decisions in selected primary prevention patients; leaves open the need for randomized confirmation of net benefit.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading global cause of morbidity and mortality. While low-dose aspirin is well established for secondary prevention, its role in primary prevention is controversial because modest benefits in cardiovascular benefits must be balanced against increased bleeding risk, as highlighted by recent large trials. Current guidelines recommend restricting aspirin use to individuals at higher cardiovascular risk without elevated bleeding risk, yet significant heterogeneity persists in defining these thresholds. Evidence from randomized trials, guidelines, cohort and modeling analyses, and post hoc or observational subgroup studies suggests that selected patients with advanced subclinical atherosclerosis or specific high-risk markers may have a more favorable risk–benefit profile, although the certainty and directness of evidence vary across subgroups. This narrative review and pragmatic clinical guide presents an illustrative tiered framework based on clinical, imaging, and biomarker markers—such as coronary artery calcium score, carotid plaque score, and lipoprotein(a)—to support individualized discussion of preventive aspirin therapy. The framework is not a validated risk calculator or standalone treatment algorithm, and decisions should balance absolute cardiovascular risk, major bleeding risk, evidence certainty, and patient preferences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santilli et al. (2026) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease (primary prevention). Low-dose aspirin was evaluated. Low-dose aspirin may provide a net clinical benefit for primary cardiovascular disease prevention in selected patients with advanced subclinical atherosclerosis or high-risk markers and low bleeding risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: