Retrospective observational study evaluates fluoroquinolone resistance and susceptibility in enteric fever, suggesting the need for continuous surveillance.
Background Fluoroquinolone resistance among Salmonella isolates causing enteric fever has emerged as a major therapeutic challenge in India. The present study evaluated the clinical profile, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and genomic mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance among Salmonella isolates from a tertiary care centre in Eastern India. Methods This retrospective observational study included 30 patients with blood culture-confirmed enteric fever between January 2023 and December 2025. Blood cultures were processed using the BacT/ALERT system (bioMérieux, France), and isolates were identified by standard biochemical tests and VITEK 2 Compact (bioMérieux). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method as per the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Bacterial whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed for two representative isolates, and resistance determinants were identified using NCBI databases. Results The median age of patients was 14.75 years with male predominance (73.3%). Salmonella Typhi accounted for 56.7% of isolates, followed by Salmonella Paratyphi A (43.3%). Fluoroquinolone resistance was observed in 63.3% of isolates. However, all isolates remained susceptible to ceftriaxone, azithromycin, chloramphenicol, cotrimoxazole and carbapenems. WGS revealed gyrA (S83F, D87N), parC (S80I) and qnrS1-mediated resistance in one isolate, while another demonstrated efflux-mediated resistance without quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) mutations. Conclusion The study highlights persistent fluoroquinolone resistance among Salmonella isolates causing enteric fever, alongside preserved susceptibility to cephalosporins, azithromycin and conventional first-line drugs. Continuous antimicrobial surveillance and genomic monitoring are essential to guide effective therapy and antimicrobial stewardship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sengupta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: