Key result
Muscle biopsy remains an essential diagnostic tool for neuromuscular disorders when genetic testing is inconclusive.
Why the study?
Next-generation sequencing and genomic technologies have shifted the diagnostic paradigm for neuromuscular disorders, prompting an examination of the evolving role of muscle biopsy.
Despite the rise of genomic medicine, muscle biopsy remains a crucial complementary component for diagnosing specific neuromuscular disorders and interpreting variants of uncertain significance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Muscle biopsy retains value for select acquired myopathies; leaves open optimal integration with genomic sequencing in practice.
This review examines the evolving role of muscle biopsy in the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders in the era of modern genomic medicine. Historically the cornerstone of myopathy diagnosis, muscle biopsy enabled structural, histochemical, and ultrastructural characterization of muscle diseases. However, the introduction of next-generation sequencing and other genomic technologies has shifted the diagnostic paradigm, with genetic testing now serving as the preferred first-line approach for many hereditary myopathies due to its non-invasive nature and high diagnostic yield. However, muscle biopsy remains indispensable in the evaluation of inflammatory, toxic, metabolic, mitochondrial, and certain rare acquired myopathies. Biopsy is also valuable when genetic testing is inconclusive, particularly for interpreting variants of uncertain significance, through histopathological, immunohistochemical, and biochemical analyses. In certain disorders, diagnosis may rely primarily on biopsy findings. Emerging technologies, including RNA sequencing, transcriptomics, proteomics, spatial transcriptomics, and artificial intelligence-assisted pathology, are expanding the diagnostic value of muscle tissue beyond traditional morphological assessment. Rather than being replaced by genomic medicine, muscle biopsy is evolving into a complementary component of an integrated diagnostic strategy that combines clinical, pathological, and molecular data to improve diagnostic accuracy and guide precision medicine in neuromuscular disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sadeh et al. (2026) conducted a review in neuromuscular disorders. Muscle biopsy vs. Genetic testing was evaluated. Muscle biopsy remains an indispensable and complementary diagnostic tool for neuromuscular disorders, particularly for inflammatory, toxic, metabolic conditions, or when genetic testing is inconclusive.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: