Key result
Slow coronary flow was associated with partially reduced left ventricular performance, evidenced by a higher isovolumetric relaxation time compared to controls (99 vs. 88; p=0.01).
Why the study?
Does slow coronary flow affect left and right ventricular performance in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Case-Control (n=70)
Does slow coronary flow affect left and right ventricular performance in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Absolute Event Rate: 99% vs 88%
p-value: p=0.01
Slow coronary flow is associated with partially reduced left ventricular performance, specifically prolonged isovolumetric relaxation time, but does not appear to affect right ventricular function.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate left and right ventricular functions using tissue Doppler echocardiography (TDE) and myocardial performance index (MPI) methods in patients with slow coronary flow (SCF) and to determine the relationship between these parameters and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count in SCF patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients (20 males and 15 females) with SCF who underwent coronary angiography and 35 age- and sex-matched controls (14 males and 21 females) without SCF who underwent elective coronary angiography were enrolled in the study. Left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) functions were examined using conventional echocardiography and TDE. RESULTS: LV systolic myocardial velocity (Sm), early myocardial velocity (Em), late myocardial velocity (Am), and Em/Am ratio were similar in both the SCF and control groups; however, isovolumetric relaxation time (IRT) was higher in the SCF group compared to the control group (IRT: 99 ± 17 vs. 88 ± 20; p = 0.01). In patients with SCF, LV MPI was higher than in the control group, but this was not statistically significant (0.61 ± 0.11 vs. 0.56 ± 0.12; p = 0.07). The RV tricuspid annular velocities and MPI were similar in the SCF and control groups. CONCLUSION: This study showed that SCF affected LV functions echocardiographically and could cause partially reduced LV performance. In addition, SCF did not affect RV functions echocardiographically.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Altunkaş et al. (2013) conducted a case-control in Slow coronary flow (n=70). Slow coronary flow vs. Controls without slow coronary flow was evaluated on Isovolumetric relaxation time (IRT) (p=0.01). Slow coronary flow was associated with partially reduced left ventricular performance, evidenced by a higher isovolumetric relaxation time compared to controls (99 vs. 88; p=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: