Key result
Slow coronary flow linked to ~0.05 higher myocardial performance index and reduced exercise capacity.
Why the study?
Endothelial and microvascular dysfunction have been implicated in slow coronary flow, but their effects on left ventricular function and exercise capacity were unclear.
Does slow coronary flow impair left ventricular function and exercise capacity compared to normal controls?
Observational (n=80)
Does slow coronary flow impair left ventricular function and exercise capacity compared to normal controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.31% vs 0.26%
p-value: p=<0.01
Patients with slow coronary flow exhibit subclinical impairment in left ventricular systolic and diastolic function that correlates with reduced exercise capacity.
SCF may link to subclinical LV impairment and reduced exercise capacity; hypothesis-generating, needs prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background: Endothelial and microvascular dysfunction have been implicated in slow coronary flow (SCF). How and to what extent do these etiological factors affect left ventricular (LV) function and exercise capacity? Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate LV systolic and diastolic function by pulsed tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) in SCF patients and their effects on exercise capacity. Subjects and methods: Sixty SCF patients and 20 control subjects were included in the study. Echocardiographic examination, treadmill exercise test, and TDI were performed. Isovolumic myocardial acceleration (IVA) and myocardial performance index (MPI) were measured. Results: TDI mean parameters for systolic and diastolic LV function were significantly impaired in SCF group with decreased Sa, IVA, Ea/Aa, and increased MPI (0.31 ± 0.06 vs. 0.26 ± 0.04, P < 0.01) compared to control. There was significant correlation between thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count and TDI mean parameters for LV systolic function (Sa & IVA, r =−0.53, P < 0.01 & r =−0.36, P < 0.05, respectively). Mean TIMI frame count was correlated with MPI and E/Ea. SCF patients had poorer peak exercise capacity than the controls (9.9 ± 1.9 METs vs. 12.7 ± 2.3, P < 0.01) with significant negative correlation with mean TIMI frame count (r =−0.46, P < 0.01). Conclusion: There is impairment of LV systolic and diastolic function in SCF patients with clinical impact on exercise capacity which emphasizes the importance of close follow‐up of these patients for risk stratification. (Echocardiography 2012;29:158‐164)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Islam A. Elsherbiny (2011) conducted an observational in Slow coronary flow (n=80). Slow coronary flow vs. Control subjects was evaluated on Myocardial performance index (MPI) (p=<0.01). Slow coronary flow was associated with an increased myocardial performance index (0.31 vs 0.26, P<0.01) and reduced peak exercise capacity (9.9 vs 12.7 METs, P<0.01) compared to controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: