Key result
LUCAS-assisted PCI enables successful revascularization during refractory arrest, though overall survival remains poor.
Why the study?
Performing PCI during active manual CPR presents significant technical challenges, and evidence on mechanical CPR-assisted PCI is limited to case reports and small observational studies.
Case Report (n=2)
No
Mechanical CPR-assisted PCI using the LUCAS device is a technically feasible strategy that facilitates uninterrupted coronary reperfusion in selected patients with cardiac arrest, though robust evidence of a survival benefit is currently lacking.
LUCAS-assisted PCI may enable revascularization during refractory arrest; leaves open survival benefit and requires prospective trials before practice change.
Cardiac arrest complicating acute coronary syndromes requires immediate coronary reperfusion; however, performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during active manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) presents significant technical challenges. The Lund University Cardiac Arrest System (LUCAS) provides automated mechanical chest compressions and enables uninterrupted CPR during coronary angiography and PCI. Existing evidence is primarily limited to case reports and small observational studies, mechanical CPR has emerged as a practical adjunct in catheterization laboratories where manual compressions are unsafe or logistically challenging. We report two cases from our center in which LUCAS-assisted PCI was performed during ongoing cardiac arrest in the setting of cardiogenic shock and acute coronary syndromes, alongside a structured narrative synthesis of contemporary literature addressing feasibility, procedural considerations, and clinical outcomes. Mechanical chest compressions allowed uninterrupted angiography and successful revascularization in both cases, with return of spontaneous circulation achieved in one patient. Despite procedural success, survival remained poor, reflecting severe global ischemia and metabolic derangement. LUCAS-assisted PCI is a technically feasible strategy that facilitates coronary reperfusion in carefully selected patients. Evidence of survival benefit remains limited and derives predominantly from observational studies and case reports rather than randomized controlled trials. The role of extracorporeal CPR (ECPR) as a complementary or alternative strategy warrants explicit consideration at appropriately resourced centers. Improved patient selection and integration into structured resuscitation pathways may enhance clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Triantafyllis et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Cardiac arrest complicating acute coronary syndromes (n=2). LUCAS-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention was evaluated on Successful revascularization and return of spontaneous circulation. LUCAS-assisted PCI during ongoing cardiac arrest enabled successful revascularization in 2 cases, with return of spontaneous circulation in 1 patient, though overall survival remained poor.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: