Key result
Time-segment analysis of heart rate variability, particularly low and high frequency components, significantly differentiated between high and low daily stress conditions (p < 0.01).
Why the study?
Most studies evaluating mental stress have relied on specific interventions and ambiguous heart rate properties, prompting the need to evaluate mental stress based on daily activities.
Does multi-time segment analysis of HRV parameters improve the detection of daily stress compared to whole-day single-segment analysis in healthy men?
Observational (n=22)
Does multi-time segment analysis of HRV parameters improve the detection of daily stress compared to whole-day single-segment analysis in healthy men?
p-value: p=<0.01
Multi-time segment analysis of HRV parameters from wearable devices can effectively distinguish between low and high daily stress levels, unlike whole-day single-segment analysis.
May support segmented HRV monitoring for daily stress via wearables in healthy men; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Present studies have successfully evaluated psychological properties such as mental health and stress by using physiological data from the cardiovascular system. Most studies established specific interventions and ambiguous heart rate properties according to homeostatic conditions. We proposed a study evaluating mental stress based on daily activities dataset. Twenty-two healthy men were observed in this study. We employed two approaches based on the time segments, while extracting the HRV parameters. We discovered that there was no significant difference between the parameters corresponding to the daily stress score groups (low- and high-stress) when we used whole-day recording in one segment HRV parameter measurement (p > 0.05). However, by extracting the HRV parameters based on multi time segments (phases 1, 2, and 3), we found parameters that were able to properly distinguish the two groups (low- and high-stress). The frequency domain parameters are the most sensitive features, especially the LF and HF (p < 0.01), followed by the total power (p < 0.05). In the time domain measurement, the RMSSD, StdHR, SD1, and SD2 are able to differentiate the participants based on the daily stress scores (p < 0.05). As a result, this study proposed that by continually monitoring biological signals based on time segment and employing the given parameters, it is possible to appropriately and meaningfully measure the daily stress condition for future classification studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sahroni et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Daily stress (n=22). High daily stress vs. Low daily stress was evaluated on Difference in heart rate variability (HRV) frequency domain parameters (LF and HF) across multi-time segments (p=<0.01). Time-segment analysis of heart rate variability, particularly low and high frequency components, significantly differentiated between high and low daily stress conditions (p < 0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: