Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Bruxism is a parafunctional activity with unclear etiology. Psychological stress might be involved. The aim of this observational study was to compare the prevalence of bruxism between cardiopathic patients and non-cardiopathic patients. Subjects and methods: The population study was based on 120 patients divided in 2 groups: Cardiopathic patients (Test-group; n=60) and Non-Cardiopathic patients (Control-group; n=60). All the patients included in the study were screened for bruxism with the “tooth wear Index” (TWI). The TWI value was supposed to be higher or equal to 2 for the 50% of the teeth to define the diagnosis of bruxism. The prevalence of bruxism was calculated and compared in both groups. Results: In the Test-group, 55 out of 60 cardiopathic patients were bruxist, with a prevalence of 91,67%. In the Control-group, 17 out of 60 non cardiopathic patients were bruxist with a prevalence of 28,33%. (Table-3) Conclusion: Cardiopathic patients showed a higher prevalence of bruxism than non-cardiopathic patients. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the relation occurring between the two conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marconcini et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: