Key result
Permanent cardiac pacing for sick sinus syndrome requires careful patient selection based on documented symptoms, as pacing has not been shown to influence survival in these elderly patients.
Careful selection of pacing devices is crucial for patients with sick sinus syndrome, as pacing has not been shown to influence survival in these patients.
Supports symptom-driven pacing decisions in elderly sick sinus syndrome; leaves open survival effects with contemporary devices.
The indications for and technology associated with permanent cardiac pacing have undergone major changes during the past decade. In contrast to the 1970s, most patients now receive cardiac pacing devices subsequent to the diagnosis of sick sinus syndrome. However, since this condition is prevalent in elderly patients, it is crucial that indications for pacing be critically evaluated and pacing recommended only for those with documented symptoms or marked abnormalities indicative of high risk for a subsequent cardiac event. This is particularly important because pacing has not been shown to influence survival in these patients. The technological advances in pacing devices during the last ten years now provide many desirable options. As a result, available pacemakers range from very simple to highly complex; accordingly, they have a wide range of prices. It is more important than ever to carefully select the appropriate pacing device for a given patient, since its cost, longevity, and required follow-up may differ greatly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nora Goldschlager (1988) conducted a review in Sick sinus syndrome and brady-arrhythmia. Permanent cardiac pacing was evaluated. Permanent cardiac pacing for sick sinus syndrome requires careful patient selection based on documented symptoms, as pacing has not been shown to influence survival in these elderly patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: