Key result
High brachial pulse pressure in young men was associated with a widened aortic pulse pressure (P<0.001) and a high output-low resistance circulatory pattern, independent of measurement site.
Why the study?
Does high brachial pulse pressure reflect central hemodynamic forces or exaggerated upper limb amplification in young healthy men?
Cross-Sectional (n=32)
Does high brachial pulse pressure reflect central hemodynamic forces or exaggerated upper limb amplification in young healthy men?
p-value: p=<0.001
High brachial pulse pressure in young men reflects a high output-low resistance circulatory pattern rather than merely an exaggerated upper limb amplification.
High brachial PP marks high-output state in young men; leaves open its independent prognostic value versus central measures.
This study investigates whether an increased brachial pulse pressure (PP) in young healthy men constitutes a representative measure of the central hemodynamic forces, or the mere expression of an exaggerated upper limb amplification. Thirty two healthy men between 17 and 28 years old underwent noninvasive evaluation of systemic hemodynamics (impedance cardiography) and pulse wave analysis (SphygmoCor). Subjects were divided into 3 predefined groups of brachial PP: < 50, 50-64, and > or = 65 mmHg. The brachial-central PP difference increased with increasing brachial PP (17 +/- 4, 22 +/- 4, and 29 +/- 4 mmHg, respectively P < 0.001). In contrast, peripheral amplification (as measured by the brachial:central PP ratio) remained constant among the tree groups, at the expense of a concomitant widening of aortic PP (P < 0.001) without difference in augmentation index. In the entire sample, central and brachial PP, and the difference between the two measures, correlated positively with cardiac output (P < 0.001) and stroke volume (P < 0.01), and negatively with systemic vascular resistance (P < 0.001), without significant relationship with heart rate. In conclusion, despite the different amplitude, central and brachial PP shared common hemodynamic determinants. A high PP among young men underlied a high output-low resistance circulatory pattern, independently of the site of measurement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alfie et al. (2004) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=32). High brachial pulse pressure vs. Lower brachial pulse pressure was evaluated on Brachial-central PP difference (p=<0.001). High brachial pulse pressure in young men was associated with a widened aortic pulse pressure (P<0.001) and a high output-low resistance circulatory pattern, independent of measurement site.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: