Key result
Brachial pulse pressure ≥ 60 mmHg was significantly associated with an increased risk of multivessel coronary artery disease (OR 1.69) in patients with stable angina.
Why the study?
Pulse pressure is associated with CAD, but prior research focused more on aortic rather than brachial pulse pressure.
Is brachial pulse pressure associated with the presence and extent of coronary artery disease in stable angina patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=654)
No
Is brachial pulse pressure associated with the presence and extent of coronary artery disease in stable angina patients?
Odds Ratio: 1.69 (95% CI 1.14–2.48)
p-value: p=0.0084
Increasing brachial pulse pressure is independently associated with an increased risk of multivessel coronary disease in patients with stable angina, particularly those with hypertension.
Should not yet change practice in stable angina; extends observational links between pulse pressure and multivessel CAD extent.
BACKGROUND: Previous epidemiological evidence has identified many risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD). Pulse pressure (PP) was reported to be associated with CAD. However, more attention was paid to aortic PP than to brachial PP. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the direct relationship between brachial PP and the presence and extent of CAD in stable angina patients. METHODS: We recruited a total of 1118 consecutive patients with stable chest pain suspected of CAD. After screening with exclusion criteria, 654 patients were finally included in our study. Every patient underwent both blood pressure measurement and selective coronary angiography. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to analyze the association between PP and the presence and extent of CAD. RESULTS: This study revealed that brachial PP was an independent correlate of multivessel CAD. In multivariate generalized linear regression model, increasing brachial PP (per 1 mmHg) were associated with the increased number of diseased vessels (β = 0.01, SE = 0.00, P < 0.0001). Binary logistic regression analysis further confirmed this association. The risk of multivessel CAD increased significantly in patients with brachial PP ≥ 60 mmHg (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.14-2.48, P = 0.0084) and as per 1 mmHg increased in brachial PP (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01-1.03, P = 0.0002), independent of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and creatinine (Cr). This association was still of statistical significance in subgroup analysis of hypertension and diabetes. CONCLUSION: Increasing brachial PP was significantly and independently associated with increased risk of multivessel coronary disease in stable angina patients. The association of brachial PP with CAD was more pronounced in hypertension group than in non-hypertension one.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Stable angina suspected of coronary artery disease (n=654). Brachial pulse pressure ≥ 60 mmHg vs. Brachial pulse pressure < 60 mmHg was evaluated on Multivessel coronary artery disease (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.14-2.48, p=0.0084). Brachial pulse pressure ≥ 60 mmHg was significantly associated with an increased risk of multivessel coronary artery disease (OR 1.69) in patients with stable angina.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: