Key result
Brachial pulse pressure was independently associated with subclinical cardiovascular disease markers, with significant interactions by gender (P<0.0001) and age for LVMI (P=0.004) and IC-IMT (P=0.008).
Why the study?
Is brachial pulse pressure independently associated with markers of subclinical cardiovascular disease in a multi-ethnic population?
Observational (n=6,776)
Yes
Is brachial pulse pressure independently associated with markers of subclinical cardiovascular disease in a multi-ethnic population?
Brachial pulse pressure is independently associated with subclinical cardiovascular disease markers (carotid IMT and LVMI), with the strength of association varying by gender, age, and race/ethnicity.
PP associations with subclinical CVD markers may persist after adjustment; leaves open independence from mean BP and demographic modification.
BACKGROUND: Brachial pulse pressure (PP) has been found to be associated with markers of subclinical cardiovascular disease, including carotid intima-media thickness and left-ventricular mass index (LVMI), but it is unclear whether these associations are independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and of the steady, nonpulsatile component of blood pressure (BP). Moreover, it is unknown whether these associations are modified by gender, age, or race/ethnicity. METHODS: We used multivariate linear regression models to assess the relationship between brachial PP and three markers of subclinical cardiovascular disease (CVD) (common carotid intima-media thickness (CC-IMT), internal carotid intima-media thickness (IC-IMT), and LVMI) in four race/ethnic groups in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. The models were adjusted for traditional Framingham risk factors (age, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, diabetes, smoking status), use of lipid-lowering medication, use of antihypertensive medication, study site, and mean arterial pressure (MAP). RESULTS: The assessment was done on 6,776 participants (2,612 non-Hispanic white, 1,870 African-American, 1,494 Hispanic, and 800 Chinese persons). The associations between brachial PP and CC-IMT, IC-IMT, and LVMI were significant in fully adjusted models. The three subclinical markers also showed significant interactions with gender (P < 0.0001), with stronger interactions in men. There was an interaction with age for LVMI (P = 0.004) and IC-IMT (P = 0.008). Race/ethnicity modified the association of PP with CC-IMT. CONCLUSIONS: Brachial PP was independently associated with subclinical CVD after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors and mean arterial pressure (MAP). The strength of the association differed significantly for strata of gender, age, and race/ethnicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winston et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Subclinical cardiovascular disease (n=6,776). Brachial pulse pressure was evaluated on Common carotid intima-media thickness (CC-IMT), internal carotid intima-media thickness (IC-IMT), and left-ventricular mass index (LVMI). Brachial pulse pressure was independently associated with subclinical cardiovascular disease markers, with significant interactions by gender (P<0.0001) and age for LVMI (P=0.004) and IC-IMT (P=0.008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: