Inpatient cardiac rehabilitation initially improved risk factors, but benefits deteriorated over 12 months (e.g., smoking 39% to 5% to 10%, P<0.001), with 886 patients experiencing recurrent events.
Cohort (n=2,441)
Yes
What is the long-term trajectory of cardiac risk factors, recurrent clinical events, and medication adherence in patients undergoing routine in-hospital cardiac rehabilitation therapy after acute coronary disease?
The benefits of in-hospital cardiac rehabilitation on cardiovascular risk factors following acute coronary events are only partially maintained at 1 year, highlighting the need for continuous outpatient medical care strategies.
AIMS: Systematic data are sparse on clinical outcome after acute coronary disease followed by cardiac rehabilitation therapy. Therefore, our objective was to determine the long-term development of cardiac risk factors, recurrent clinical events, and cardiac medication in patients undergoing routine in hospital cardiac rehabilitation therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the prospective PIN Study (Post Infarct Care), 2441 consecutive patients (78% men, 60+/-10 years, 22% women, 65+/-10 years) were enrolled in 18 inpatient rehabilitation centres in Germany following myocardial infarction (56%), coronary artery bypass graft (38%) or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (6%). Cardiac risk factors, pre-specified clinical end-points, and the prescription of cardiac medication were prospectively documented on admission to and at discharge from rehabilitation therapy, and 3, 6 and 12 months later by obtaining information with standardized questionnaires from the patients and their physicians. The cardiac risk factors improved initially during cardiac rehabilitation therapy, but deteriorated within the following 12 months: 39% patients smoked at the beginning vs 5% at the end of in hospital rehabilitation vs 10% at 12 months follow-up (P140 and/or 90 mmHg were 24 vs 8 vs 25% (P200 mg. dl(-1)57 vs 29 vs 51% (P<0.01). A total of 886 patients experienced one or more recurrent clinical events during the first year, 69% of those within the initial 6 months. At 12 months follow-up, 77% of patients received aspirin, 70% beta-blockers, 62% lipid lowering medication, and 53% angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. CONCLUSION: The present results indicate that the benefit of cardiac rehabilitation therapy following acute coronary events is only partially maintained during the following year. Continuous strategies of medical care need to be developed to improve the long-term outcome in coronary patients.
S N Willich (Thu,) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary disease (n=2,441). Inpatient cardiac rehabilitation therapy was evaluated on Development of cardiac risk factors, recurrent clinical events, and cardiac medication. Inpatient cardiac rehabilitation initially improved risk factors, but benefits deteriorated over 12 months (e.g., smoking 39% to 5% to 10%, P<0.001), with 886 patients experiencing recurrent events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: