Key result
Adenoviral vectors show promise in preclinical arthritis models but face clinical barriers including transient gene expression, immunogenicity preventing repeat dosing, and safety concerns.
While adenoviral vectors are effective for preclinical proof-of-concept in arthritis gene therapy, their clinical utility is currently limited by immunogenicity, transient expression, and safety concerns.
Adenoviral vectors aid preclinical arthritis gene therapy yet face human barriers; leaves open clinical translation pending safer vectors.
Recombinant adenoviruses are straightforward to produce at high titres, have a promiscuous host-range, and, because of their ability to infect nondividing cells, lend themselves to in vivo gene delivery. Such advantages have led to their widespread and successful use in preclinical studies of arthritis gene therapy. While adenoviral vectors are well suited to 'proof of principle' experiments in laboratory animals, there are several barriers to their use in human studies at this time. Transient transgene expression limits their application to strategies, such as synovial ablation, which do not require extended periods of gene expression. Moreover, there are strong immunological barriers to repeat dosing. In addition, safety concerns predicate local, rather than systemic, delivery of the virus. Continued engineering of the adenoviral genome is producing vectors with improved properties, which may eventually overcome these issues. Promising avenues include the development of 'gutted' vectors encoding no endogenous viral genes and of adenovirus-AAV chimeras. Whether these will offer advantages over existing vectors, which may already provide safe, long-term gene expression following in vivo delivery, remains to be seen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Evans et al. (2001) conducted a review in Arthritis. Adenoviral vectors was evaluated. Adenoviral vectors show promise in preclinical arthritis models but face clinical barriers including transient gene expression, immunogenicity preventing repeat dosing, and safety concerns.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: