Key result
ECG-gated ensemble averaging enhancement increased the rate of correct first heart sound detections from 90.6% to 97.6% compared to localization without enhancement in healthy subjects.
Why the study?
Does ECG-gated ensemble averaging enhancement improve the accuracy of first heart sound localization compared to methods without it?
Does ECG-gated ensemble averaging enhancement improve the accuracy of first heart sound localization compared to methods without it?
The addition of ECG-gated ensemble averaging significantly improves the accuracy of first heart sound localization, which may enhance continuous tracking of blood pressure and respiration.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enable precise real-time S1 localization in monitoring; leaves open clinical validation.
We have previously developed a method for localization of the first heart sound (S1) using wavelet denoising and ECG-gated peak-picking. In this study, an additional enhancement step based on cross-correlation and ECG-gated ensemble averaging (EA) is presented. The main objective of the improved method was to localize S1 with very high temporal accuracy in (pseudo-) real time. The performance of S1 detection and localization, with and without EA enhancement, was evaluated on simulated as well as experimental data. The simulation study showed that EA enhancement reduced the localization error considerably and that S1 could be accurately localized at much lower signal-to-noise ratios. The experimental data were taken from ten healthy subjects at rest and during invoked hyper- and hypotension. For this material, the number of correct S1 detections increased from 91% to 98% when using EA enhancement. Improved performance was also demonstrated when EA enhancement was used for continuous tracking of blood pressure changes and for respiration monitoring via the electromechanical activation time. These are two typical applications where accurate localization of S1 is essential for the results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahlström et al. (2008) studied Healthy (n=10). ECG-gated ensemble averaging (EA) enhancement vs. S1 localization without EA enhancement was evaluated on Correct S1 detections. ECG-gated ensemble averaging enhancement increased the rate of correct first heart sound detections from 90.6% to 97.6% compared to localization without enhancement in healthy subjects.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: