Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rural local government in Mexico is contested terrain, sometimes representing the state to society, sometimes representing society to the state. In Mexico's federal system, the municipality is widely considered to be the ‘most local’ level of government, but authoritarian centralization is often reproduced within municipalities, subordinating smaller, outlying villages politically, economically and socially. Grassroots civic movements throughout rural Mexico have mobilized for community self-governance, leading to a widespread, largely invisible and ongoing ‘regime transition’ at the sub-municipal level. This study analyzes this unresolved process of political contestation in the largely rural, low-income states of Guerrero, Hidalgo, Oaxaca and Chiapas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonathan Fox (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: