Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines the challenges of legally recognising customary (adat) rights in an Indonesian region. Through this analysis, we observe multi-layered processes of territorialisation, including: the residual adat-based (genealogical-territorial) authority of pre-colonial political systems; the incorporation of the region into larger colonial and post-colonial state structures; and the more recent attempt by Indigenous advocacy groups (non-governmental organisations, NGOs) to establish adat territories through countermapping and legal reforms. We refer to this emergent multi-layered condition as territorial pluralism. Adat systems have been re-shaped by the state and NGO practices; and adat has informed state territoriality. These territorialisations do not operate independently from each other but are mutually constitutive and further intersect with co-evolving rules and institutions that determine access to land by households and individuals. For customary rights advocacy organisations, our study suggests a pragmatic way forward: engaging with both adat-based territorial claims over broader landscapes, while also engaging with state-administered collective land titling initiatives. Both necessarily involve bargaining with the state. Importantly, the consequences of state-based recognition of both adat territories and property rights for community land access remain intimately related to contingent, place-specific, processes of agrarian change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neilson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: