Key result
Both Ambulatory Impedance Monitor systems detected significant changes from sitting to standing posture in heart rate (p=0.03), stroke volume (p=0.002), and other hemodynamic variables.
Why the study?
Does the Ambulatory Impedance Monitor (AIM) accurately detect hemodynamic changes associated with postural shift in persons with hypertension?
Cross-Sectional (n=17)
Does the Ambulatory Impedance Monitor (AIM) accurately detect hemodynamic changes associated with postural shift in persons with hypertension?
p-value: p=<0.001
The Ambulatory Impedance Monitor provides valid and reliable estimates of cardiac function and hemodynamic changes during postural shifts in hypertensive patients.
AIM may enable dynamic hemodynamic monitoring in daily life for hypertension; leaves open diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility.
The management of hypertension is improved by knowledge of the hemodynamics underlying blood pressure. Impedance Cardiography (ICG) provides data on a range of hemodynamic variables that affect blood pressure. However, ICG captures only fixed descriptions of hemodynamic characteristics. Improvements in ambulatory technology have led to the development of the Ambulatory Impedance Monitor (AIM) which records hemodynamic data during the activities of daily living. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of the AIM to detect hemodynamic changes associated with postural shift in persons with hypertension. Using a repeated measures cross-over design, sitting and standing hemodynamic measures were taken in seventeen persons with hypertension while wearing the AIM-BpTRU system designed for standard office use and the AIM-Spacelabs system designed for ambulatory monitoring. Both AIM-blood pressure monitoring systems detected significant changes from sitting to standing posture in heart rate (p=0.03), stroke volume (p=0.002), left ventricular ejection time (p<0.001), systemic vascular resistance (p=0.03) and diastolic blood pressure (p<0.001). Additionally, both systems generated measures of cardiac function that were positively correlated (p<0.001) and not significantly different (p>0.05). Our findings support previous work and demonstrate that the AIM provides valid and reliable estimates of cardiac function in persons with hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McFetridge-Durdle et al. (2008) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=17). Ambulatory Impedance Monitor (AIM) systems (AIM-BpTRU and AIM-Spacelabs) vs. Sitting vs standing posture was evaluated on Hemodynamic changes associated with postural shift (heart rate, stroke volume, left ventricular ejection time, systemic vascular resistance, and diastolic blood pressure) (p=<0.001). Both Ambulatory Impedance Monitor systems detected significant changes from sitting to standing posture in heart rate (p=0.03), stroke volume (p=0.002), and other hemodynamic variables.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: