Key result
Rosiglitazone significantly increased left ventricular systolic velocity (+2.6 cm/sec, P<0.0001) in type 2 diabetic patients, whereas pioglitazone did not.
Why the study?
Does rosiglitazone compared to pioglitazone improve myocardial function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and normal left ventricular systolic function?
RCT (n=40)
Randomized
Does rosiglitazone compared to pioglitazone improve myocardial function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and normal left ventricular systolic function?
p-value: p=< 0.0001
Rosiglitazone, but not pioglitazone, significantly improved systolic myocardial function assessed by tissue Doppler imaging in patients with type 2 diabetes over 4 months.
TZDs warrant caution for subclinical myocardial effects in T2DM; leaves open whether TDI detects early changes in larger trials.
OBJECTIVE: Despite many potential benefits, thiazolidinedione (TZD) use has been associated with increased exacerbation rate of heart failure due to fluid retention. In our study, the effect of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone on myocardial function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and normal left ventricular systolic function was evaluated by both conventional echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI). METHODS: Forty patients who were diagnosed type 2 DM according to the American Diabetes Association criteria were included in the study. After baseline evaluation, all patients were randomly assigned to receive either rosiglitazone 4 mg twice daily or pioglitazone 30 mg daily for 4 months. Blood samples were taken and detailed pulsed-wave and tissue Doppler echocardiographic examination was performed at baseline and 4 months after TZD therapy. RESULTS: Left ventricular systolic velocity (Sm) values were found to be significantly increased in the rosiglitazone group (+2.6 + or - 0.7 cm/sec, P < 0.0001), while they remained unchanged in the pioglitazone group. Left ventricular early diastolic velocity (Em) increased at the same extent in both groups after treatment (rosioglitazone: +0.7 + or - 0.7 cm/sec; pioglitazone: +0.5 + or - 0.4 cm/sec, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, while rosiglitazone and pioglitazone therapy improved metabolic parameters, blood pressure values and diastolic function similarly, in type 2 diabetic patients, only rosiglitazone improved systolic myocardial function significantly. (Echocardiography 2010;27:512-518).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pala et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes mellitus with normal left ventricular systolic function (n=40). Rosiglitazone vs. Pioglitazone 30 mg daily was evaluated on Left ventricular systolic velocity (Sm) (p=< 0.0001). Rosiglitazone significantly increased left ventricular systolic velocity (+2.6 cm/sec, P<0.0001) in type 2 diabetic patients, whereas pioglitazone did not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: