Key result
A 1 standard deviation increase in waist-to-hip ratio was significantly associated with incident cardiovascular disease in both diabetic women (HR 1.32; 95% CI 1.06-1.65) and men (HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.00-1.48).
Why the study?
Does waist-to-hip ratio predict incident cardiovascular events better than other anthropometric measures in adults with type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=1,010)
Does waist-to-hip ratio predict incident cardiovascular events better than other anthropometric measures in adults with type 2 diabetes?
Hazard Ratio: 1.32 (95% CI 1.06–1.65)
Waist-to-hip ratio is a stronger predictor of incident cardiovascular events than BMI or waist circumference in adults with type 2 diabetes.
Waist-to-hip ratio may refine CVD risk assessment in type 2 diabetes; leaves open superiority over BMI or waist circumference.
BACKGROUND: Obesity is one of the most important cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors among diabetic populations. We evaluated the ability of different anthropometric measures for predicting CVD among type 2 diabetic patients. METHODS: The study consisted of 411 men and 599 women, aged ≥30 years, free of CVD at baseline with a median follow-up of 8.4 years. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for CVD were calculated for a 1 standard deviation change in body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) using Cox proportional regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 188 CVD events occurred (men, 90; women, 98). In women, in confounder-adjusted analysis [age, fasting plasma glucose (instead of glycosylated hemoglobin), and positive family history of CVD], WHR was associated with incident CVD [1.32 (1.06-1.65)], followed by WC and WHtR, which were marginally significant (P=0.06 and 0.08, respectively); after adjustment for hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, only WHR predicted CVD significantly. In men, the confounder-adjusted (age, fasting plasma glucose, and aspirin use) HR to predict CVD was significant only for WHR [HR 1.21(1.00-1.48)]. CONCLUSION: This study showed WHR was the most powerful predictor of CVD among anthropometric measures, followed by WHtR, in diabetic population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khalili et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes (n=1,010). Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) vs. 1 standard deviation decrease/lower WHR was evaluated on Incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) per 1 standard deviation increase in WHR (women) (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.06-1.65). A 1 standard deviation increase in waist-to-hip ratio was significantly associated with incident cardiovascular disease in both diabetic women (HR 1.32; 95% CI 1.06-1.65) and men (HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.00-1.48).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: