Key result
Catheter ablation of atrial flutter was associated with a significant 6% reduction in the adjusted hazard of overall hospital-based healthcare utilization (HR 0.94) compared to no ablation.
Why the study?
Does catheter ablation of atrial flutter reduce healthcare utilization, atrial fibrillation, or stroke in patients with atrial flutter?
Cohort (n=33,004)
Yes
Does catheter ablation of atrial flutter reduce healthcare utilization, atrial fibrillation, or stroke in patients with atrial flutter?
In a large real-world cohort, catheter ablation of atrial flutter was associated with significant reductions in hospital-based healthcare utilization and incident atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support lower healthcare use after atrial flutter ablation; leaves open randomized confirmation of benefit.
Atrial flutter ablation is associated with a high rate of acute procedural success and symptom improvement. The relationship between ablation and other clinical outcomes has been limited to small studies primarily conducted at academic centers. We sought to determine if catheter ablation of atrial flutter is associated with reductions in healthcare utilization, atrial fibrillation, or stroke in a large, real world population. California Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project databases were used to identify patients undergoing atrial flutter ablation between 2005 and 2009. The adjusted association between atrial flutter ablation and healthcare utilization, atrial fibrillation, or stroke was investigated using Cox proportional hazards models. Among 33,004 patients with a diagnosis of atrial flutter observed for a median of 2.1 years, 2,733 (8.2%) underwent catheter ablation. Atrial flutter ablation significantly lowered the adjusted risk of inpatient hospitalization (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.84-0.92, p<0.001), emergency department visits (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.54-0.65, p<0.001), and overall hospital-based healthcare utilization (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98, p = 0.001). Atrial flutter ablation was also associated with a statistically significant 11% reduction in the adjusted hazard of atrial fibrillation (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97, p = 0.01). Risk of acute stroke was not significantly reduced after ablation (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.81-1.45, p = 0.57). In a large, real world population, atrial flutter ablation was associated with significant reductions in hospital-based healthcare utilization and a reduced risk of atrial fibrillation. These findings support the early use of catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial flutter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dewland et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Atrial Flutter (n=33,004). Catheter ablation of atrial flutter vs. No ablation was evaluated on Overall hospital-based healthcare utilization (ambulatory surgery, inpatient, and emergency department encounters) (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98, p=0.001). Catheter ablation of atrial flutter was associated with a significant 6% reduction in the adjusted hazard of overall hospital-based healthcare utilization (HR 0.94) compared to no ablation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: