Key result
Catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure reduced inpatient admission costs by 40% ($4165 pre-ablation to $2510 post-ablation, P<0.0001) and AF admissions by 64%.
Why the study?
Little is known about how healthcare utilization and cost change after catheter ablation in patients with AF and HF.
Does catheter ablation reduce healthcare utilization and cost in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure?
Cohort (n=1,568)
Does catheter ablation reduce healthcare utilization and cost in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure?
Effect estimate: 40% reduction
Absolute Event Rate: 2510% vs 4165%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Catheter ablation in patients with AF and HF is associated with significant, sustained reductions in healthcare utilization and costs up to 3 years post-procedure.
May reduce costs in AF-HF; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is an effective treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). However, little is known about how healthcare utilization and cost change after ablation in this population. We sought to determine healthcare utilization and cost patterns among patients with AF and HF undergoing ablation. METHODS: Using a large United States administrative database, we identified (n = 1568) treated with ablation with a primary and secondary diagnosis of AF and HF, respectively, were evaluated 1-year pre- and postablation for outcomes including inpatient admissions (AF or HF), emergency department (ED) visits, cardioversions, length of stay (LOS), and cost. A secondary analysis was extended to 3-years postablation. RESULTS: Reductions were observed in AF-related admissions (64%), LOS (65%), cardioversions (52%), ED visits (51%, all values, p < .0001), and HF-related admissions (22%, p = .01). There was a 40% reduction in inpatient admission cost ($4165 preablation to $2510 postablation, p < .0001). In a sensitivity analysis excluding repeat-ablation patients, a greater reduction in overall AF management cost was observed compared to the full cohort (-43% vs. -2%). Comparing 1-year pre- to 3-years postablation, both total mean AF-management cost ($850 per-patient per-month 1-year pre- to $546 3-years postablation, p < .0001) and AF-related healthcare utilization was reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation in patients with AF and HF resulted in significant reductions in healthcare utilization and cost through 3-years of follow-up. This reduction was observed regardless of whether repeat ablation was performed, reflecting the positive impact of ablation on longer term cost reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Field et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation and heart failure (n=1,568). Catheter ablation vs. 1-year pre-ablation period was evaluated on Inpatient admission cost (40% reduction, p=<0.0001). Catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure reduced inpatient admission costs by 40% ($4165 pre-ablation to $2510 post-ablation, P<0.0001) and AF admissions by 64%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: