Key result
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation was associated with significantly lower overall mortality compared to no ablation (9.386 vs. 23.032 per 1000 person-years; p<0.001).
Why the study?
Real-world data were needed to estimate the number of AF patients undergoing catheter ablation in Italy and to evaluate their clinical outcomes and economic burden.
Does catheter ablation improve clinical outcomes and reduce economic burden in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=3,084)
Yes
Does catheter ablation improve clinical outcomes and reduce economic burden in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 9.386% vs 23.032%
p-value: p=< 0.001
In a real-world Italian cohort, catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation was associated with significantly lower mortality, reduced hospitalizations, and decreased healthcare costs compared to non-ablated patients.
Informs real-world AF ablation utilization and burden; leaves open optimal selection and outcome improvements in unselected populations.
A real-world analysis among the Italian population has been carried out to estimate the number of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing catheter ablation and to evaluate their clinical outcome and economic burden. A retrospective analysis on administrative Italian databases has been performed. Between January 2011 and December 2019, all patients diagnosed with AF were considered and those undergoing catheter ablation were identified. Overall, 3084 (3.54%) of AF patients with at least one catheter ablation were included (mean age 63.2, 67.3% males). A significant decrease in the use of AF-related medications and in hospitalizations, mainly related to AF and heart failure, was observed during the 3-year post-ablation period. The average total cost per patient during the 1-year before ablation period was significantly higher compared to the 1-year post-ablation cost (EUR 5248 vs. 4008, respectively; p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, the overall mortality of patients who underwent ablation was significantly lower compared to that assessed in patients not treated with the procedure (9.386/1000 vs. 23.032/1000 person-year, respectively; p < 0.001). Moreover, the mean total costs were significantly higher in patients who did not undergo ablation compared to those who received ablation (EUR 5516 vs. 4008, respectively; p < 0.001). This real-world data analysis shows that in Italy, although catheter ablation is performed in a minority of AF patients, it is associated with significantly better post-procedure clinical outcomes and a significant reduction in healthcare-related costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esposti et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=3,084). Catheter ablation vs. No catheter ablation was evaluated on Overall mortality (p=< 0.001). Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation was associated with significantly lower overall mortality compared to no ablation (9.386 vs. 23.032 per 1000 person-years; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: