Key result
64-slice cardiac CT demonstrated 77% diagnostic accuracy (100% sensitivity, 73% specificity) for detecting atrial thrombi, which improved to 86% when accounting for typical filling defects.
Why the study?
Does 64-slice cardiac CT accurately detect atrial thrombi compared to TEE and cardiac surgery in patients undergoing cardiac imaging?
Observational (n=64)
Does 64-slice cardiac CT accurately detect atrial thrombi compared to TEE and cardiac surgery in patients undergoing cardiac imaging?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
64-slice cardiac CT has 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value for excluding atrial thrombi, making it a reliable tool to rule out thrombi before procedures like radiofrequency ablation.
OBJECTIVES: Atrial thrombi are a potential source for cerebral and peripheral emboli. Objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography (CT) for detection of atrial thrombi in comparison with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and cardiac surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients were examined with ECG-gated multidetector CT coronary or pulmonary vein angiography. All patients underwent TEE. Cardiac surgery was performed in 31 patients. The Hounsfield units (HU) of atrial lesions were measured. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT for the detection of atrial thrombi was 77%: sensitivity 100% (9/9), specificity 73% (40/55), positive predictive value (PPV) 38% (9/24), and negative predictive value (NPV) 100% (40/40). All 15 false positive (FP) findings by CT were located in the left atrial appendage (LAA). Four characteristic imaging features suggesting incomplete filling of the LAA were noted in FP: "hypostatic layering," 5/15 (33%); "flow phenomenon," 9/15 (60%); "HU-run-off," 8/15 (53%); higher intralesional HU in FP when compared with thrombi (153.8 HU +/- 71 vs. 46.6 HU +/- 10; P < 0.0001). The diagnostic accuracy of CT in detecting atrial thrombi improved significantly (P = 0.03) to 86% after defining "typical filling defects" as "flow phenomenon/>180 HU" (sensitivity 100%; specificity 84%; PPV 50%; NPV 100%). On receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis, a threshold of 60.7 HU showed a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 86.7% to distinguish between FP and thrombi. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac ECG-gated 64-slice CT is accurate to exclude atrial thrombi, which can be applied eg, in patients before radiofrequency (RF) ablation. Left atrial appendage "filling defects" cause a high number of false positive findings, and there are radiologic features, which are helpful to differentiate them from true thrombi.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feuchtner et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Atrial thrombi (n=64). 64-slice cardiac computed tomography (CT) vs. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and cardiac surgery was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for detection of atrial thrombi. 64-slice cardiac CT demonstrated 77% diagnostic accuracy (100% sensitivity, 73% specificity) for detecting atrial thrombi, which improved to 86% when accounting for typical filling defects.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: